Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • Unruffled [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -15 hours ago

    You are describing intentional misgendering. That’s against our instance rules, so make sure you use preferred pronouns for folks who display them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      Can using neutral pronouns be misgendering? I was always under the impression that they’re universally applicable regardless of the other person’s gender

      • frozen
        link
        fedilink
        152 minutes ago

        Consider the scenario where you meet a man. You know his name is Bradley (either through mutual friends or whatever), but he introduces himself as Alex. You can call him Bradley, and it would be technically correct, but it would be slightly rude when he has explicitly given his preferred name as Alex.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      I would argue calling all they/them is the opposite of misgendering. “They” has no gender. It is neuter.

      “Intentional non-gendering” seems sensible and inoffensive. No chance of misgendering anyone.

      • Unruffled [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        I’m a gender abolitionist philosophically, so I get what you are saying and I would also prefer for everyone to agree to adopt using gender neutral language and be done with it. But we should still respect the preferred pronouns of others, because it isn’t up to you or me to force that choice on everyone else. It’s not much different from a Republican (for example) refusing to use she/her towards a trans woman. For some folks their pronouns are super important to them, so imo it’s just disrespectful not to use them when they are stated.