I strongly believe in the validity of my hypothesis (which every experimentalist does I guess), but I can’t find an explanation for the outliers, or the possible explanations are too many. Can I still publish with five good data points? How should I deal with the other five? I assume it’s unethical to not report them, right?

  • Poplar?
    link
    English
    113 hours ago

    Theyve edited the post, looks like they had a pretty reasonable question but wrote it badly.

    • AatubeOP
      link
      fedilink
      18 hours ago
      1. Post was edited three years ago. The answer I link to also responds to the update.
      2. Though it’s no longer insane, I don’t think the question was made reasonable by the update.