Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • What if the government

    “The government”. Am I thinking of Anna L. Strong on the disconnect between people and “government” in western countries.

    Ah, my point is that you seem to think yourself distant from the government. You don’t take part in making decisions, some entity (“government”) does.


    Edit, yes I am, This Soviet World, “ON INTERPRETING A WORLD”

    I note a remark about American unemployment: “If it gets any worse, they’ll have to do something.” Who is this ultimate, uncontrollable “they”? The term betrays the class society of which the speakers are unconscious; they are waiting for some boss to act. To hear a debate: “Is America going fascist?” and think how much less passively Soviet folk would word it. “Shall we go fascist? No. Then exactly how shall we prevent it?” Soviet folk say “we” of one-sixth of the earth’s surface. Uzbek cotton-pickers, toiling under the sun of Central Asia, say: “We are conquering the Arctic; we rescued the Chelyuskinites.” Ukrainian farmers who never went up in an airplane talk of “our stratosphere records” and “the loss of our Maxim Gorky airplane” as they take up collections to build ten new ones. But even Mrs. Roosevelt asks me: “Are Russian peasants getting more reconciled to accepting direction?” I feel the hopelessness of language as I answer: “No, they are learning better to organize and direct themselves.”

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      19 hours ago

      I figured using “government” would result in some disconnect, but I’m not sure what else I would call a centralized authority responsible for making and carrying out societal decisions.

      Anyways, it doesn’t matter if I’m part of the government. The issue remains.