Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I don’t mean to say that neural activity ∝moral weight. I am merely asserting that something without neural activity at all (or similar construct) can’t be worth anything. This is why a rock has no moral value, and I don’t need to treat a rock nicely.

    I am less confident – but still fairly confident – that consciousness, pain, and so on require at least a couple neurons – how many, I’m not sure – but creatures like tiny snails and worms probably aren’t worth consideration, or if they are then only very little. Shrimp are complex enough that I cannot say for sure that they aren’t equal in value to a human, but my intuition says they still don’t have fully-fledged sentience; I could be wrong though.

    The strongest evidence that shrimp don’t have sentience is anthropic – if there are trillions of times more shrimp than humans, why am I a human and not a shrimp? Isn’t that astoundingly improbable? But anthropic arguments are questionable at best.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 hours ago

      why am I a human and not a shrimp? Isn’t that astoundingly improbable?

      haha yes i agree with that :D

      my personal (kinda spiritual) take on this is that we are conscious because we are “nature’s soldiers” and we’re fighting the greater cause of life itself. That is what our consciousness is targeted at and what gives it justification in front of the world.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        I apologize, I just realized I got mixed up with a neighbouring debate regarding animal welfare lol. Thus the shrimp.