The final version of the agreement, dated February 24 and seen by the FT, would establish a fund into which Ukraine would contribute 50 per cent of proceeds from the “future monetisation” of state-owned mineral resources, including oil and gas, and associated logistics. The fund would invest in projects in Ukraine.

(…)

However, the agreement omits any reference to US security guarantees which Kyiv had originally insisted on in return for agreeing to the deal. It also leaves crucial questions such as the size of the US stake in the fund and the terms of “joint ownership” deals to be hashed out in follow-up agreements.

(…)

Ukrainian officials added that the deal was just a “framework agreement” and that no revenues would change hands until the fund was in place, allowing them time to iron out any potential disagreements. Among the outstanding issues is to agree the jurisdiction of the agreement.

Mirror: https://archive.is/2025.02.25-183836/https://www.ft.com/content/1890d104-1395-4393-a71d-d299aed448e6

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      People who want this war to continue: Putin, some of his oligarchs, Trump, and some of our oligarchs, also a bunch of dumbasses.

      People who want the war to stop: Ukraine, a multitude of Russians, and most the world.

      It ends by Russia leaving and paying to fix what the did. Sanctions for the next 50 years are a slap on the wrist. A proper send off would be for them to slit the throats of every oligarch involved. That includes Putin and now Trump. Their actions resemble rabies

    • @iAvicenna
      link
      English
      12 hours ago

      well I mean if the original warmonger sees that he can get away with the war he started, he will keep doing this after this one is over too. I am saying this being fully aware of the fact that all powerful countries participate in war mongering one way or the other so it is indeed a self feeding cycle of frenzy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 hours ago

        I don’t think Russia can start shit somewhere else even if it wanted to.
        It’s hard to make sense of these conflicting narratives. On one hand we’re being told that Russia sucks so much, they wasted all their good weapons, tanks, etc, even brought out the rust buckets from 50 years ago, etc, and if anything they’ve proven just how weak they are.
        On the other hand we’re being told “oh no, watch out, they’re going to attack NATO next”. Well…with what?

        • @iAvicenna
          link
          English
          12 hours ago

          I think there is still a difference if Russia loses all that power for nothing vs it gets what it wants (mostly at least). But my impression is also that it has gotten significantly weaker in this war and this was perhaps Europe’s and UKs (and US initially) aim, that weaken Russia using a remotely controlled nation…

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 hours ago

      I want the war to end asap. All that’s required is for the aggressor to stop. Appeasement will mean more war because cost becomes acceptable.