@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 day agoThat explains a lotmander.xyzimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1685arrow-down111
arrow-up1674arrow-down1imageThat explains a lotmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 day agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•12 hours agoI think the bigger they are faster tge evaporate. They lose mass at some ratio between their surface and mass.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•7 hours agoExactly the opposite. The bigger one is, the less it evaporates. Time required to evaporate scales with Mass^3
minus-square@DogWaterlinkEnglish1•11 hours agoThat’s true the constant rate I mentioned would vary with the surface area of the black hole as it changes but the volume would increase exponentially faster
I think the bigger they are faster tge evaporate. They lose mass at some ratio between their surface and mass.
Exactly the opposite. The bigger one is, the less it evaporates. Time required to evaporate scales with Mass^3
That’s true the constant rate I mentioned would vary with the surface area of the black hole as it changes but the volume would increase exponentially faster