France is about to pass the worst surveillance law in the EU. We must stop them now! | Tuta
tuta.com
An amendment to the “Narcotrafic” law is moving to the French National Assembly. Remind your legislators that a backdoor for the good guys only is not possible.
  • @[email protected]English
    1•20 hours ago

    Huh? I don’t think you understand my comment. Except for the last line, you’re just further agreeing with me and I’m already agreeing with you.

          • @StupidBrotherInLawEnglish
            2•9 hours ago

            Telling someone who says government access will be used to spy on citizens but will be useless for combating serious crime that they want telescreens, a fictitious device used for government spying, doesn’t make any sense. Either you don’t know what a telescreen is, you have poor reading comprehension, or you’re a fairly clever troll. Maybe some of all the above.

            • Steve DiceEnglish
              -2•9 hours ago

              I’m telling someone who says that a want for uncompromising privacy is a US thing that it’s not, and that these compromises they speak of would be akin to telescreens if applied to a non-digital situation.

              • @StupidBrotherInLawEnglish
                2•8 hours ago

                I’m telling someone who says that a want for uncompromising privacy is a US thing that it’s not

                But their comment doesn’t say or suggest that.

                and that these compromises they speak of would be akin to telescreens if applied to a non-digital situation.

                And they don’t say anything about the compromises except that they’d be used for spying on citizenry.

                This isn’t my fight, I saw you were confused and thought I’d help. My mistake, you really are one of those double down or die types.

                  • @StupidBrotherInLawEnglish
                    1•7 hours ago

                    Wow indeed. We’re only a few comments deep, so you can see the comment. This one:

                    Continuing the analogy, government agencies can absolutely eavesdrop on in-person conversations unless you expend significant resources to prevent it. This is exactly what I believe will happen - organized crime will develop alternate methods the government can’t access while these backdoors are used to monitor less advanced criminals and normal people.

                    I challenge you to show where it suggests a “want for uncompromising privacy is a US only thing.” Then point out where they show support for government access to communications.

      • @[email protected]English
        1•13 hours ago

        So then you’re in favor of these government backdoors? Because your comment suggests the opposite.

        • Steve DiceEnglish
          0•10 hours ago

          No, I don’t agree that a want of privacy is an American thing.

          • @[email protected]English
            2•10 hours ago

            So you misread my comment but you’re one of those types who can’t admit when they’re wrong. I’d say it’s our little secret but I see someone else pointed it out too.

            • Steve DiceEnglish
              -1•1 hour ago

              Nope. You’re the one refusing to admit being wrong.

              Edit: I was totally in the wrong here. Someone else just pointed out you’re not the original commenter.