• @multiplewolves
    link
    English
    182 days ago

    I was curious why someone downvoted you, so I took a look at the video.

    That is absolutely 100% CGI and I’m not sure why anyone is doubting that. I’m on mobile and I can still see it.

    Take my upvote.

    • @FauxLiving
      link
      English
      21 day ago

      The biggest tell is at 0:21.

      You see the badge flying around as a physics object and then, when the animation stops the left side part of the necklace “resets” and slides up on the bots neck despite that being like a ball suddenly deciding to go from a rest to rolling up hill.

      It looks like it went from being rendered as a physics object to slowing down enough that it returned to being a regular object attached to the model’s rigging .

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        317 hours ago

        I don’t see the movement with the badge you’re describing, can you screenshot it for me? It looks normal to my untrained eye and I’d like to get better at spotting fakes

      • @multiplewolves
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        The badge, the soft landings, and the seams in the concrete blipping in and out were the biggest factors for me.

        Edit for downvoter: Watch nothing but the concrete for the whole video. I think the badge moved too perfectly and the landings didn’t seem to reflect physics, but the jitter on the concrete rendering is beyond unrealistic.