Norwegian fuel company Haltbakk Bunkers has announced it will cease supplying fuel to U.S. military forces in Norway and American ships docking in Norwegian ports, citing dissatisfaction with recent U.S. policy towards Ukraine.

  • Cosmic Cleric
    link
    English
    21 day ago

    It shows up in many of the threads he’s in, and judgments about his little signature dominate over anything he actually had to say.

    Yep, yep. Like right here for example. And this was going on 9-10 months ago too, its a bi-daily thing.

    A single line of text that is a link to a Creative Commons license really shouldn’t be pissing off so many people.

    I mean, do people also get pissed off when they scroll down the bottom of each and every Wikipedia page, and see the CC license there? Or read an news article that has a license footer at the end of the article?

    To be tinfoil hatty about it for a moment, I really do believe at this point that I’m being attacked repeatidly (every 48ish hours) by a bot brigade used by someone(s) who really doesn’t want others to start doing what I’m doing, licensing their content, by harassing me off of Lemmy.

    My licensing is not just to tell for-profit entities that they can’t use my content for free, its to tell non-profit open-source projects that they can use my content for free.

    I agree, but not in a “this guy is an idiot” kind of way,

    Yeouch. I thank you for the support, but damn that hurts too.

    For the record, I truly believe that the Safe Harbor laws, and that Laws trump ToS, means that I truly own the content that is being posted here (and so do you and everybody else who posts/comments, for that matter). Even if its not being inforced today, the laws are on the books, and this will come to a head a some point.

    I mean, look at whats going on right now with Mozilla/Firefox and their ToS changes. Corporations sure are not shy to use licensing of their content to the best of their abilities.

    Why should only corporations avail themselves and be protected by the law? Why is everybody else so quick to surrender the little protections under the law that they have, and to ridicule others who try to use the law to their benefit?

    Take a moment, and really think that one though. Its like there’s a Corporate version of Order 66 going on or something. 😜

    By the way [email protected], while I started to reply to you directly, the above is really a response to everyone who would be intellectually honest in judging my actions and take a moment to think it though before replying to me.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 day ago

      I think that you should keep posting with your signature if it makes you happy. I have some sincere doubts it will force a corporation to exclude your content from any aggregated data, though, nor do I think anyone is giving up their rights by not properly licensing their comments here. Copyright is automatic in the USA. The problem isn’t the licensing, its the fact that no court is properly enforcing these rights. And, too few governments have data privacy laws on the books.

      I’m not interested in relitigating those points though, I’m sure you’ve heard them. I guess I’m just typing that up so you know where I’m coming from.

      I do think your signature is valuable when it makes people consider who owns their data, and why the CC license is important.

      Personally I think you should put an explanation in your bio. I think your message will be served better if you can point to a pre-written explanation (or even an old style FAQ). But, I don’t think you’re obligated to do so. Its all gravy. People are going to fight you regardless.

      Did you see that post from that guy mad about a period character on slashdot? Lmao

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        English
        11 day ago

        Personally I think you should put an explanation in your bio.

        Actually I have the CC license info/link in my bio as well.

        But, I don’t think you’re obligated to do so.

        If people ask me with honest intent I would be responding in kind and explain it, gladly. But that is not been my experience here on Lemmy.

        So I don’t know why I should put myself through that kind of trolling from others, again, again, and again, under the guise of trying to educate someone on what a CC license is, who most likely already knows, or by a bot starting a brigade cycle.

        I know that’s a cynical view, and I hate stating what I just did, but I feel that I truly earned the right to that cynical opinion, as that’s what the vast majority of my experiences have been here on the Lemmy, both ten months ago, as well as currently.

        The irony is that if someone just clicks on the link in my footer it’ll take them to a page of the license that also explains what the Creative Commons license is, so they really don’t need me to explain it, they could just click on the link I’ve already supplied.

        I do appreciate your kind words and civil discussion, and suggestions, thank you for that, sincerely.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      When you wear a tinfoil hat out in public, the people snickering aren’t trying to tap into your brainwaves. Well, I mean shit, maybe they are. Depends on the drip.