• @vzq
    link
    English
    269 hours ago

    It’s worse: they are banking on fusion and SMR, which are pipe dreams even at twice the time scale:

    “We are looking at fusion and new-generation fission with completely different tools compared to large-scale nuclear plants of the past,” he stated.

    I hope they are lying knowing they are lying.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 hours ago

      It is a great way to funnel money to your friends, let them get billions for doing some digging and pouring some concrete and then scrape the project claiming the science wasnt there yet.

    • atro_city
      link
      fedilink
      37 hours ago

      The strategy focuses on advanced technologies, including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), microreactors, and fourth-generation fission technology. The plan also includes investments in nuclear fusion, reflecting a long-term commitment to sustainable energy development.

      You’re missing an important part that I highlighted. It doesn’t mean that they expect to have fusion up and running by 2030.

    • Ziggurat
      link
      fedilink
      59 hours ago

      Last time I saw the ITER roadmap 20 years ago, it was large scale commercial fusion for 2100 and I really doubt that was a game changer which would shorten this roadmap.

      Sure US move forward with some startup perfectly knowing that 90% of them will bankrupt (and sell %some patents), 5% will bend to a different field (If you have a patent on better supra-conducing magnet, you can also build MRI and particle accelerators) and may-be 5% will stay on the “fusion research field”. But I doubt they’ll have a commercial fusion powerplant soon.