• @Bytemeister
    link
    English
    3911 hours ago

    The deal should be… All Russian troops get pulled out of Ukraine. Ukraine gets a lump sum of all seized Russian assets in foreign nations, Russia agrees not to move troops within 100 miles of Ukraine’s border without Ukraine’s consent. Ukraine agrees to allow and even assist civillain Russian services with locating and returning living and deceased Russians.

    The alternative is we take the limits off of what targets can be attacked within Russia, and enable Ukraine to enforce the conditions as proposed.

    I’d also like to add that Russia and the US give up their UN “super veto” power. I don’t think anything good and effective can come from the UN when a single country can just “nope” any UN proposals.

    • @pressanykeynow
      link
      1311 hours ago

      Veto power in the UN is a short for “we will use nukes if you do this”. The UN is not world government, it’s the organisation which task(among many less important things) is to prevent nuclear war.

      • @Bytemeister
        link
        English
        1710 hours ago

        Ah, that explains why India and North Korea have veto power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          79 hours ago

          As good as this comment is, neither has the range or targeting capability that the US does or that the USSR did.

          The security council veto was designed to keep the US and the USSR at the negotiating table and off the battlefield.

          • @Bytemeister
            link
            English
            39 hours ago

            Then why are all those other nations on the security council? Just seems like we only need the memembers with veto power at this point.

        • @ZMoney
          link
          510 hours ago

          We would have a much more effective UN if only Pakistan stopped vetoing everything!