Edit: I meant to leave this empty to start, but to clarify now that there’s other discussion:
“Access to minerals” doesn’t necessarily mean “discounted” or “mineral rights”. It could be a deal consisting of:
- Military aid goes to EU defence industry supplies
- In exchange, EU gets first dibs at market rate contracts (with some tax-exempt on on the EU side for imports to make it more appealing to take advantage of on both sides) for metals/mineral extraction.
This could help spur Ukraine’s post-war economy, integration with EU markets, and benefit the EU defence industry. It would also demonstrate what a real and fair deal looks like.
There are some relevant european defense contractors. Maybe not in the Top 10 worldwide, but we do have a capable defense industry here.
Revenue means jack shit, for the most part US gear buys US favour, on the ground, it’s pretty shit despite being stupidly expensive. I’ll take a Grippen or Stridsvagn every day of the week. Also, with the rearmament, all of these companies will grow substantially.
This is basically what I was thinking. “Access to minerals” doesn’t necessarily “access without market cost”. It could be a deal consisting of:
I think what Ukraine needs most is a stable and secure environment. Nobodly wants to invest in an area where there could be war next month.