• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    551 day ago

    It will be a shit show until Canada and the rest of the western world work out agreements independent of the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      221 day ago

      Over here in the EU we still need gas and oil. I’d much rather import it from Canada than from Qatar or some other middle eastern dictatorship.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        As a Canadian I agree but that is difficult. Canada is so integrated with the US that they basically refine all of our crude. Canadian crude is unlike crude from anywhere else and has to be refined a certain way. So we have to build refineries or you do, that can handle our capacity. That takes time and certainly won’t be instantaneous. It’s not like we can just divert.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          114 hours ago

          Yeah plus the transport would be much more expensive. But I guess building your own refineries will give much more flexibility for the future…

    • @gilogr
      link
      9
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      They should call it “The Free World Agreement”.

    • @Alpha71
      link
      English
      161 day ago

      We’re already doing that. EVERYBODY is doing that. every western nation is doing their best to cut America out of their trading deals. Donnie has seriously fucked America over.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 day ago

      Isolating a fascist power with the strongest military in the world doesn’t work. Eventually they work up the balls to use it.

      Every nation should be prepared for what happens when the purge of the US military and government is complete and only loyalists hold power.

      • @slickgoat
        link
        161 day ago

        Given that there are no ideal moves in any direction, I feel that standing up to the bully is the only option on the table. They failed to do that in 1939.

      • @slickgoat
        link
        91 day ago

        And another thing. Its America’s job to police this mess, they installed him either directly or indirectly. The rest of the world didn’t ask or vote for this dangerous toddler.

          • @slickgoat
            link
            14 hours ago

            I’m not sure what to make of that in context. Do you mean that we should just suck it up?

              • @slickgoat
                link
                22 hours ago

                Don’t fret… I have absolutely no expectations that Americans can pull out of this power dive. I just hope that most of the damage will be self inflicted.

      • @seejur
        link
        English
        41 day ago

        What happens if a NATO country Attack another NATO country?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          No joke, I can see UK and France offering nuclear retaliation response promise to Canada, outside of NATO. I think trump really is dumb enough to start real war with for example Canada. NATO is dead, rest of the west needs to make similar protection agreements without USA, besides NATO , for when shit really hits the fan (I think it will, it’s a matter of when, not if).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              From article 5 from the NATO treaty actually. It states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members.

              Edit: the article or nato treaty doesn’t state it that explicitly actually. But a quick google show that it’s at least the consensus interpretation

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                It has been hotly debated, mostly in regards to Greece and Türkiye, who have been at each other’s throats for decades. In that case, the aggressor likely wouldn’t be obvious and both are likely to claim article 5. Their relations to other NATO members are also a lot more ambiguous, some favoring one, some the other.

                In the case of a rogue USA attacking Canada, or Denmark, I believe the case would be a lot clearer.

              • @Alpha71
                link
                English
                216 hours ago

                it states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members

                Which America would be if they leave NATO…