It’s fine he meant to gaslight the subject with an incomplete argument anyone can fill their own blanks into. The equivalent of ragebait posts. It’s our duty to not feed the trolls!
Ya I see it now. Youll find plenty of rhetoric that 4 years ago was the day they stole the election. It gets confusing, I think he could have been more clear.
It’s treason then
4 years ago…
ETA: guess I have to remind people that 4 years ago was when January 6th happened…
Huh?
It’s fine he meant to gaslight the subject with an incomplete argument anyone can fill their own blanks into. The equivalent of ragebait posts. It’s our duty to not feed the trolls!
I think they’re saying he was clearly already treasonous four years ago because of Jan 6. That’s me admittedly filling in their vague comment though.
Yes, that’s exactly what I was talking about.
Oh yeah, that makes the most sense now that you say it.
I’ll make shit up. He was talking about how 4 years ago the president should have been impeached for this same treasonous behavior.
4 years ago was when January 6th happened…
Ya I see it now. Youll find plenty of rhetoric that 4 years ago was the day they stole the election. It gets confusing, I think he could have been more clear.
4 years ago was when January 6th happened…