The Trump administration is effectively declaring that the nation’s roughly 700 immigration judges can no longer count on civil service rules that safeguard their independence by protecting them from arbitrary removal, according to a Department of Justice memo that was sent to the judges. The memo from DOJ—which oversees the immigration courts—was flagged for me by the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, or IFPTE, the judges’ union, which believes this will make it far easier to fire judges without cause.

The judges and their representatives fear that this is designed to pave the way for the removal of judges who don’t consistently rule against migrants in deportation and asylum cases—and thus frustrate Trump and his hard-line immigration advisers. Replacing them with judges who will more reliably rule against migrants could theoretically speed up the pace of deportations.

“What they want to do is fire immigration judges that don’t issue rulings to their liking,” said Matthew Biggs, the president of IFPTE, “and replace them with judges that will simply rubber-stamp what President Trump wants.”

This represents a serious escalation of Trump’s assault on the immigration system. Last month, DOJ fired 20 immigration judges with no public rationale; those were largely probationary officials. Then, last week, DOJ let it be known that it will no longer observe restrictions that constrain the removal of administrative law judges, a category that decides federal government agency cases and doesn’t include most immigration judges.

But now, DOJ is signaling that it will disregard restrictions on removal for the broad category of immigration judges as well, according to the DOJ memo, which was addressed to all employees of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, or EOIR, the agency within the DOJ that oversees the immigration courts. The memo acknowledges that under current law, these judges benefit from “multiple layers of for-cause removal restrictions,” meaning they can’t be fired at will. But it adds that EOIR “may decline to recognize those restrictions if they are determined to be unconstitutional.”

Translated into plain English, this means that if restrictions on removing immigration judges are “determined” by the DOJ to be unconstitutional, they will no longer apply, immigration lawyers say. It’s only a matter of time until this “determination” is made.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250306122530/https://newrepublic.com/article/192318/trump-immigrant-deportations-low-rage-unnerving

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    25 hours ago

    and don’t want facism from either side.

    I don’t think you know what fascism means…

    So folks like me demand they fix the system from within the system.

    That’s what I’m complaining Biden didn’t do…

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      05 hours ago

      It sounds to me like you were saying biden should use trumps way of doing things like clearing house or whatnot. I really don’t get your complaint then because biden did a lot within the system. It takes congress to repeal the patriot act or citizen united or fisa. Now that ball was dropped when someone says biden or the democrats dropped the ball im like bullshit but if someone actually talks about the specific things that have fucked us like those laws then, yeah, that means something. Are most democrats not working to fix those. yes. are some working to fix those. yes. are any republicans working to fi those. sorta. like one or two although I think they might have been libertarians.