• grumps
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 days ago

    Having read the transcript, no, he does not. There’s absolutely no reason beyond “both sides” bullshit to connect the two. Unlike Kirk, he didn’t go on hateful tirades about groomers, drag shows, or pedophiles.

    Having been disappointed by Newsom several times, what he did say in the podcast continues his disappointing trend and gives unacceptable levels of support to crazy conservative garbage thinking.

    You can think Newsom said something terrible without taking the opportunity to make Kirk seem like he isn’t a hateful extremist.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 days ago

        They’ll downvote because they don’t wanna know that rich Democrats agree with rich Republicans.

      • @Donjuanme
        link
        02 days ago

        A better source than the words transcribed from his own mouth??

        What sort of money are you making to push this damn agenda?

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 days ago

          If people harmed by these actions done by Republicans, are feeling targeted by the words of a Democrat defending them, he sucks shit.

          Sorry you don’t like that the notoriously out of touch NeoLib isn’t a saint.

        • @return2ozmaOP
          link
          32 days ago

          Do you NOT know a shitlib when you see one? Newsom is not a "radical leftist"and he’s corrupt AF. Owned by the Getty family.

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 day ago

            Do you NOT know a shitlib when you see one?

            No because a shitlib is “electable” and “the only sane one in politics” and other things to brush aside their policies that impact everyone but the rich.