When the lander got down within about 30 km of the lunar surface, they tested the rangefinders again. Worryingly, there was some noise in the readings as the laser bounced off the Moon. However, the engineers had reason to believe that, maybe, the readings would improve as the spacecraft got nearer to the surface.

“Our hope was that the signal to noise would improve as we got closer to the Moon,” said Tim Crain, chief technology officer for Intuitive Machines, speaking to reporters afterward.

It didn’t. The noise remained. And so, to some extent, Athena went down to the Moon blind.

After Athena landed, the engineers in mission control could talk to the spacecraft, and they were able to generate some power from its solar arrays. But precisely where it was, or how it lay on the ground, they could not say a few hours later.

Based on a reading from an inertial measurement unit inside the vehicle, most likely Athena is lying on its side. This is the same fate Odysseus met last year, when it skidded into the Moon, broke a leg, and toppled over.

“I would like to get a picture,” Altemus said. “I would like to get more data before we can determine the orientation.”

  • threelonmusketeersOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 days ago

    Dude, it happened just a few hours ago. The guy has to sleep at same point, right? He did tweet about it, but it’ll probably be a day or so before he publishes a full article.

    https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1897793984509984974

    Catching a falling rocket is still damned impressive. Just a remarkable engineering feat. Congratulations to the 1,000s of engineers at SpaceX who broke their minds working on that.

    https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1897795132222537778

    The loss of Starship on ascent during the second flight in a row is clearly a serious setback for SpaceX.

    • @9tr6gyp3
      link
      English
      -13 days ago

      Yep. He isn’t critical of SpaceX at all. Thats why.