Renewables surprisingly “on track” to meet net zero by 2050::undefined

  • @SCB
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    We have 50 years.

    • @eleitl
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That would be sure nice, but the hard numbers of the physical reality say otherwise.

      If you think we do have 50 years I recommend to reexamine the data. E.g. https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions is pretty comprehensive.

      • @SCB
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Ok doomer.

        • @eleitl
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          If you want to have an argument, try using arguments. Quantitative ones, like in https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions

          If you don’t want to have a conversation, continue to use empty assertions and slurs. But count me out of that.

          Your choice entirely.

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sorry bro I don’t ever buy into doomposting.

            Enjoy being meaninglessly sad.