Bluesky, which uses it, has been opened to federation now, and the standard basically just looks better than ActivityPub. Has anyone heard about a project to make a Lemmy-style “link aggregator” service on it?

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 day ago

    Really? In what way?

    Digital identities being cryptographic and independent of any one instance is huge all on it’s own. The rest of it I understand less clearly, but it looks pretty modular.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      See here. Basically, creating a relay for the AT protocol is extremely costly and only possible for big tech companies.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Thank you!

        TL;DR, the relay bit works as a completely connected network topology, and has the associated quadratic growth issues, which renders it, like you said, hard to host.

        Also nasty: Direct messages are just not federated.

        Other things are or were at the time of writing janky, but nothing else is quite that egregious. The author is working on a separate project, and recommends this idea as a solution for portable identity on ActivityPub; here’s what “object capability” means in the context.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The data is not centralized, but everyone is using the same aggravation aggregation service (indexer) to access the data.