• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 hours ago

    I take it by your ignoring my first question you don’t have an actual answer.

    Your shitty wing would have lost by more. People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn’t have turned out to vote regardless. It’s your own fault. Your side is politically irrelevant.

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Your shitty wing would have lost by more.

      My wing doesn’t support genocide.

      People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn’t have turned out to vote regardless.

      She tried to court them and only them anyway.

      EDIT: misread as “not far enough to the right.” If people who thought she was too far to the right were so insignificant that they could be safely ignored, they’re too insignificant to blame for the loss she earned by moving to the right to please your shitty wing of the party.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 hours ago

        According to you, your wing got Trump elected, so it does.

        Was healthcare, civil rights, education and equitable taxation not enough of a carrot?

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          25 hours ago

          According to you, your wing got Trump elected, so it does.

          Now where did I say that? Your wing is the one that thought genocide was the most winningest issue ever.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 hours ago

            Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her. The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.

            And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.

            • @Ensign_Crab
              link
              English
              24 hours ago

              Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her.

              You’re continuing to be ridiculous. All she had to do was put one lousy photon of daylight between her and biden on the subject. That was too big an ask.

              The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.

              We tried to warn you that it would happen. We could read the writing on the wall. Your wing chose to ignore it because you just loved genocide that much.

              And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.

              If you’re trying to appeal to people who love genocide, it is. That’s republicans. They were never going to vote for harris. That’s the problem with moving to the right. republicans don’t believe you but democrats do,

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -13 hours ago

                You were never going to vote for Harris.

                You would rather whine about Democrats than actually act to prevent the Republicans from actually engaging in genocide.

                Because the God honest truth is you don’t give a fuck about Gaza. This is all about stroking your ego and that is all it has ever been about. And that is why you will remain totally irrelevant, because you don’t aim to accomplish anything and nobody will ever support your political ego trip.

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  21 hour ago

                  You were never going to vote for Harris.

                  I did vote for harris. I also tried to warn the pro-genocide wing of the party what would happen. Lots of people like me did. Pretty sure centrists knew and didn’t care as long as no one listened to the left.