The reality is that the next federal election will not save us, and regardless of what you think of my writing, you certainly know this deep down. Even a Carney reprieve is unlikely to stave off an even more rabid Conservative party in the next election after this one. But if we aren’t clear-eyed about what is happening, then we sure as hell cannot see where we’re going. And to have a banker, a CEO’s man in the office of Prime Minister, it is going to bring with it a world of challenges that near certainly will pave the road for someone worse than Poilievre.
No, I’m arguing for not amplifying Conservative taking points. Campaign FOR your candidate, not against another non-Conservative candidate.
Conservative talking points? I have no idea what you’re talking about.
https://lemmy.world/post/26620261
Loreto is saying that there is no material difference between the LPC and the CPC. The conservatives absolutely say they are different.
Ultimately though, here is what Loreto is actually saying:
Bad faith, bad also kinda garbage, interpretation: “she’s saying don’t vote and that it doesn’t matter, she’s dampening the vote”.
Good faith, useful, interpretation: “vote how you will, but know that if you want real change about real problems it will take more than just voting”.
“Harris supported genocide in Gaza” helped elect a fascist dictator wannabe who has whole throatedly supported the ethnic cleansing of Gaza so that he can build a billionaire’s paradise resort.
But by all means, continue.
Aaaaand you circled back to a US political strategy that I’ve been arguing is not applicable to Canada. This is now a loop.
Same fucking playbook.
https://youtu.be/R59JmC0u63I?si=haAAfXdq-oMQGMMU