• chingadera
    link
    75 hours ago

    Why 4B? Why not 50M? That’s way enough for an overtly comfortable lifestyle

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      75 hours ago

      Any less and he couldn’t sustainably sway the entirety of the US’s governing structure by dividends alone, with redundancy.

      • chingadera
        link
        22 hours ago

        Is there some finance math behind that or something? Sounds like it’s a pretty concrete figure when you say it like that, but I’m not financially literate enough to understand

        • [email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 hour ago

          300M to buy a presidency once every four years, leaving him 3.7B to recoup his costs at 8%/year to stay ahead of inflation. If that wouldn’t work out, swap to purchasing the ears of 20% of all US senators.

          Though I didn’t realize that senate races average 90M now, so my figures were out of date. I was just winging it with mental math, nothing authoritative.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            252 minutes ago

            What part of Musks personality indicates he is this prudent? My guess is he would gamble it on the next idea but the market will turn in him because losing people billions (the only way he ends up with only 4 billion) is unforgivable.

            Trump only lost millions and had to turn to the mob. If Musk worked with the mob he’d be at the bottom of a river in a week .

          • chingadera
            link
            31 hour ago

            Fair enough, but even if those figures were on the low end, that’s devastatingly low for what’s at stake