• @LesserAbe
    link
    English
    1721 hours ago

    I think what has made starlink possible at all has been that musk also owns SpaceX so he can launch a shit ton of satellites. No other launch provider can match their cadence, so I’d guess that will be a limiting factor

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      618 hours ago

      Oneweb is medium altitude unlike starlink which is low altitude, so you don’t need as many. It doesn’t have as much capability but it’s fine. But when starship is operational there will be plenty of capacity to launch a lot more sats and get more capacity.

      • @dustyData
        link
        English
        1118 hours ago

        NGL, I’ve always hated starlink’s proposal. They last so little time and polute the sky making astronomy harder and raising risks of collision. It’s LEO littering for a product that could be substituted with existing infrastructure tech at a fraction of the cost.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      720 hours ago

      They only need to cover the band that orbits over Ukraine for now tho, not the entire world right

      • Natanox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 hour ago

        That’s still a lot since those satellites aren’t geostationary. To guarantee a stable, permanent connection in all of Ukraine and the adjacent Sea I’d assume you might need up to 3 of those bands of satellites. Now, fortunately, Ukraine doesn’t necessarily require a lot of bandwidth. It just has to be a reliable few mbps that can be easily set up everywhere.