• @pyre
    link
    English
    148 hours ago

    while I support Canada boycotting the US, you have to admit this in particular is “freedom fries” tier patriotism. it was embarrassing then, and it is embarrassing now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      If politicians are pushing this particular change, it would be a bit cringe imo but I chuckled when I saw it.

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 seconds ago

        Agreed that it would definitely be much worse, and maybe I wouldn’t have found it as cringe if I hadn’t seen the push for “Freedom Fries” back in the day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 hours ago

      Yeah, no. If you didn’t support their pointless wars back then, they would call you a traitor. Fuck me for not wanting my friends to die.

      • Cinder Bloc
        link
        English
        23 hours ago

        You could not support their wars, and also not stoop to their level of pettiness.

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        04 hours ago

        I don’t understand what this has to do with anything I said.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 hours ago

          The “freedom fries” 20 years ago occurred because France did not want to support our stupid middle eastern wars. That spawned the stupid movement to stop calling them French fries. If you were not pro-war in the US in the early 2000’s, a lot of people would suggest you were unpatriotic.

          That is why they said. Because you brought it up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 hours ago

      Except back then the US was the aggressor, and now the US is the aggressor. I wouldn’t equivocate “you don’t want to blindly follow me into a pointless war” to “you’re targeting me in a trade war”

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        05 hours ago

        I would agree if this was Mexico doing it as a response to the gulf thing… then it would have made some sense in context.

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          English
          34 hours ago

          Have you not heard about the tariffs and threats of annexation from Trump?

          • @pyre
            link
            English
            14 minutes ago

            Yes. Please refer to my original comment, once again, clearly in support of boycotting the US in actually meaningful ways. I say this would be more understandable coming from Mexico because then it would be a jab, against the US unilaterally trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico, so it would make sense to rename something named after America(ns) in return.

            “Oh, you did tariffs and threatening annexation, I shall no longer call this coffee Americano” just doesn’t follow logically. And compared to the threat it is the weakest, lamest, most pathetic form of protest imaginable. That’s my point.

    • Gloomy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      We changed the nane of a product because you haven’t joined us wilding an unjustified war on brown people

      vs.

      We changed the name of a product because you waged an unjustified trade war against us for no reason, even tough we have been your closest alley.

      Not the same.

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        -25 hours ago

        I didn’t question motivations. I already said I support boycotting the US. this is not a method of protest that does anything. it’s lame and stupid. Americano is not even American, nor is it Canadian. it’s just dumb. it’s like saying you remember watching Canadian Pie as a teen.