@SomeoneElseM to Confidently Incorrect • 1 year agoI honestly wouldn’t mind having a “calorie weigher”imagemessage-square8arrow-up1118arrow-down12
arrow-up1116arrow-down1imageI honestly wouldn’t mind having a “calorie weigher”@SomeoneElseM to Confidently Incorrect • 1 year agomessage-square8
minus-square@BeefPianolink14•1 year agoCalorie weigher. You tell it what the food is and it tells you how many calories are in it based on the weight. Probably not super accurate, but fits the bill.
minus-square@SomeoneElseOPMlink7•1 year agoI think you’ll find that calories are based on weight and more weight equals more calories. /s
minus-squareSSUPIIlinkfedilink3•1 year agoWell, 50 grams of white chocolate have less calories than 100 grams of white chocolate.
minus-square@totallynotarobotlink4•1 year agoThey both effectively have 0 calories because no one will eat that nonsense.
minus-square@SomeoneElseOPMlink3•1 year agoYes, but 100g of lettuce has less calories than 50g of chocolate.
minus-squareSSUPIIlinkfedilink3•1 year agoOf course. Was to give the user in the screenshot a very tiny bit of reason
Calorie weigher. You tell it what the food is and it tells you how many calories are in it based on the weight. Probably not super accurate, but fits the bill.
I think you’ll find that calories are based on weight and more weight equals more calories. /s
Well, 50 grams of white chocolate have less calories than 100 grams of white chocolate.
They both effectively have 0 calories because no one will eat that nonsense.
Yes, but 100g of lettuce has less calories than 50g of chocolate.
Of course. Was to give the user in the screenshot a very tiny bit of reason