@SomeoneElseM to Confidently Incorrect • 1 year agoI honestly wouldn’t mind having a “calorie weigher”imagemessage-square8arrow-up1118arrow-down12
arrow-up1116arrow-down1imageI honestly wouldn’t mind having a “calorie weigher”@SomeoneElseM to Confidently Incorrect • 1 year agomessage-square8
minus-square@SomeoneElseOPMlink7•1 year agoI think you’ll find that calories are based on weight and more weight equals more calories. /s
minus-squareSSUPIIlinkfedilink3•1 year agoWell, 50 grams of white chocolate have less calories than 100 grams of white chocolate.
minus-square@totallynotarobotlink4•1 year agoThey both effectively have 0 calories because no one will eat that nonsense.
minus-square@SomeoneElseOPMlink3•1 year agoYes, but 100g of lettuce has less calories than 50g of chocolate.
minus-squareSSUPIIlinkfedilink3•1 year agoOf course. Was to give the user in the screenshot a very tiny bit of reason
I think you’ll find that calories are based on weight and more weight equals more calories. /s
Well, 50 grams of white chocolate have less calories than 100 grams of white chocolate.
They both effectively have 0 calories because no one will eat that nonsense.
Yes, but 100g of lettuce has less calories than 50g of chocolate.
Of course. Was to give the user in the screenshot a very tiny bit of reason