When you block ads on YouTube, the ads are deleted. This has the problem of not giving creators money, forcing you to actually spend $10/mo or whatever the average Patreon subscription is. What if there was an option for an ad to play in the background while a black rectangle covers the screen while temporarily muting the browser tab? (Since the ad still plays in the background, the creator still gets money, allowing you to be a freeloader) edit: peertube has no ads

  • @TeaHands
    link
    201 year ago

    I’m a small-time YouTuber who relies on the ad money to an extent.

    My take is that if you like what I do, can’t afford a donation, but don’t want to sit through ads, first of all I’m still happy you’re there and enjoying the content. Even the view itself is valuable in a small way, algorithm-wise.

    Secondly though there are plenty of other things you can do that help bring in more viewers who might be able and willing to support monetarily. Sharing videos, commenting and liking on new videos to give them that initial bump, recommending the channel when it’s relevant to a conversation. In my case, taking a free pattern I’ve made available for you to follow along with a tutorial video, and making sure to give credit when you make the project. Etc etc.

    It genuinely all helps and although my YT friends are all small-time like me, there’s not a single one of us that doesn’t appreciate our regular viewers regardless of whether they actually earn us money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Just out of curiosity… if you could charge per view rather than relying on ads, how much would you need to charge per view in order to meet your income goals?

      • @TeaHands
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Views vary wildly between videos so I took my last year’s stats to average it out a bit. Looks like the answer is around 10p.

          • @TeaHands
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Hah, no, ten pence, as in one hundred pence to a GBP 😉

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Ahhh that makes more sense… that’s about 0.13 USD. It’s interesting to me, because I would gladly pay that much per video (or more!) if it meant I didn’t have to watch ads.

              Of course that model doesn’t exactly lend itself to mindlessly clicking through videos (which is what Youtube wants). I know there are other video platforms out there… do you know of any that charge users per view?

              Thanks for doing the math!

              • @TeaHands
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                Honestly no idea, I don’t know much about alternative platforms at all. Only just started to look into other options myself!

                I’d never framed it in terms of price per view but I do love a good stat so no worries lol, was interesting.