• @T156
    link
    English
    5912 hours ago

    There’s also an argument that if the business was that reliant on free things to start with, then it shouldn’t be a business.

    No-one would bat their eyes if the CEO of a real estate company was sobbing that it’s the end of the rental market, because the company is no longer allowed to get houses for free.

      • SeekPie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 hours ago

        Doesn’t mean that businesses should allowed to be.

    • NicoleFromToronto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1510 hours ago

      Businesses relying on free things. Logging, mining, ranching, and oil come to mind. Extracting free resources of the land belonging to the public, destroying those public lands and selling those resources back to the public at an exorbitant markup.

      • finder
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Extracting free resources of the land

        Not to be contrarian, but there is a cost to extract those “free” resources; like labor, equipment, transportation, lobbying (AKA: bribes for the non-Americans), processing raw material into something useful, research and development, et cetera.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          74 hours ago

          Unregulated capitalism. That’s why people in dominant market positions want less regulation.

          • @slumberlust
            link
            English
            12 hours ago

            Entrenched companies often want more regulation to prevent startup competition. Pulling the ladder up behind them.