• @Eheran
    link
    English
    11 day ago

    Why? What for?

    • @mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      I guess to overcome electron degeneracy pressure. Nucleus would collide more easily when electrons are stripped away. Not sure if i am conpletely true though

      • @Eheran
        link
        English
        122 hours ago

        Heat means more vibrations, which means less density and more force needed to compress the matter to the same density. Just compare any solid material to plasma. Or the 100 million kelvin plasma at ITER, which has an absurdly low density (like a high vacuum) but still 1 bar of pressure due to the thermal pressure.

        Electron degeneracy pressure is always present when there are electrons, regardless if they are part of an atom or free moving in a plasma.

        • @mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 hours ago

          Higher heat also means more violent collisions. It would be much harder to collide nucleus by just pressing it. But yeah maybe with even more pressure it might happen but nuclear reactions usually happen with high speed collisions.

          When electrons are bound to nucleus, it may prevent collision by having an additional layer causing degeneracy pressure between two colliding nucleus. That won’t happen if electrons are unbounded to nucleus. Atleast that’s what i imagine

          • @Eheran
            link
            English
            121 hours ago

            The electron pressure is always there.

            But you are right regarding the thermal energy making fusions easier, which can happen at any pressure or density with enough velocity. At this point I am not even sure which of the 2 approaches (cold and far denser or hot and far less dense) would be “easier”, where we would have to first define what easier would actually be…