• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    USA have really no concept of non-sexual nudity?

    [EDIT] - seems less of nudes and more of full on pornographic pictures, my bad.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      I mean… Not really. But tbh, if anyone feels like “all nudity is bad” in America, it’s the GOP. So, there is significant irony in a party member potentially participating in dissemination - knowing the number of times any involvement in the past has been criticized on these very grounds.

      • golamas1999
        link
        51 year ago

        Remember when Bill O’Reilly would monologue about “disgusting debauchery of Spring Break” over videos of sexy young women playing volleyball in bikinis.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        Not a fan of republicans but it seems rather obvious that it was not her intent to send sexual content to minors. But yes there is an irony that republicans would be the last to recognise that there is non-sexual nudity, so you have a point.

    • @dgilluly
      link
      91 year ago

      Despite your edit, from what I can tell of being born and raised in the USA, there isn’t really a concept of non-sexual nudity, outside of locker rooms/campsite bathouses, some restrooms, and of course, nudist communities/beaches.

      Even just taking a leak somewhere that is somewhat secluded if there are no restrooms can land someone a public urination and maybe an indecent exposure charge.

      • @Eldritch
        link
        31 year ago

        This is what comes of being largely founded by puritanical moronic zealots. Many of them were the Scientology of their age. Europe was glad to ship them over here.

    • @scottywh
      link
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This would really be more like non-consensual sexual nudity… Potentially sent to minors who might unexpectedly be exposed to it (presumably) without their or their parents’ or guardians’ consent.

      Accidental or not, my understanding is that the reason she was sharing the photos to begin with was because she believed there was something “scandalous”, embarrassing, and specifically sexual going on in the photos.

      • @sheilzy
        link
        31 year ago

        If Hunter were a woman, and likely if Greene were a man too, I feel there would be more significant pressure on Greene to apologize.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I don’t think so. If Hunter was a woman he now would be shamed endlessly, the focus would be on him instead of the perpetrator and there would be several porn sites featuring his photos.

          • @sheilzy
            link
            31 year ago

            Well, that, too, probably. Not to mention all comments like “Why would a woman with grown and married daughter act that way?!!?!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Is it? I thought it was just nudes? Anyways - sounds like peak stupid politics, hope you guys can come back to more rational times.