• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Personal property is for personal use. That’s it.

    Once you start to accumulate surplus property then its very obviously not personal anymore. A person that doesn’t want a garden won’t have one to sell you, because they wouldn’t have one in the first place.

    Don’t think in terms of “right” and “wrong”. Think materially.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      111 year ago

      what if their father left them the garden and they want to sell it to me? what if they want to move somewhere else and they decide to sell me their property?

      • @Squizzy
        link
        Français
        11 year ago

        Inheritance is antithetical to meritocracy is the basis for generational wealth and capitalist dynasties.

        Everything must go, use it lose it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          01 year ago

          What even is your motivation to do more than the bare minimum to survive if not to leave it to your children? I would rather take care of my kids future than let some corrupt government do it who will prioritize their children over mine

            • @MindSkipperBro12
              link
              31 year ago

              You overestimate how much the average person cares for people they don’t know.

                  • queermunist she/her
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    It is! Humans are naturally cooperative and empathetic, we aren’t selfish assholes that only care about our immediate families.

                    Empathy is a skill. It atrophies under capitalism, but it could be trained and flourish under different conditions.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              Français
              -51 year ago

              In the entirety of human history communism has never worked. Not once has any society been able to work on the ideals of it.

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                Français
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, because the US bombs them or funds terror cells or blockades their economy.

                Cold War. Communism was hunted and destroyed whereever it arose.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Français
                  -31 year ago

                  If communism was so strong it wouldn’t have to worry about capitalist intervention. You just proved my point of communism / socialism being weak if the apparent enemy is easily able to wreck you economy and implode your country it is not a strong system.

              • @Squizzy
                link
                Français
                11 year ago

                It’s impossible to uncouple society from capitalism. It’s not a possibility, but it definitely could work. Maybe capitalism just needs longer than communism to fail?

                The wealthiest country in the world has unaffordable healthcare and homelessness, how is that capitalism working?

          • @Squizzy
            link
            Français
            31 year ago

            So what are all those people without kids doing?

            Make a better world, build a stronger economy for them excel in and make their own way. I plan on providing the very best for my children to let them go about their life as they see fit and not have to rely on something I might pass down.

            Corrupt governments is a cop out statement too, ideally you wouldn’t stand for government corruption.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        -121 year ago

        A person who could actually assemble a farm through small land acquisitions through the power of friendship probably deserves it tbh

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            Français
            -21 year ago

            You’re talking about using your personal connections within the community to slowly assemble a farm from small acquisitions like their deceased father’s garden and then leveraging those connections to find people to help you work the land. People that don’t need to give you their land and don’t need to work your land, they’re actually choosing to do it freely. That’d actually be amazing if it ever happened.

            That basically has zero relation with how farms work under capitalism.

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                Français
                -31 year ago

                Except they don’t need money, so it’s still a free choice they’re making.

                When you don’t need money to have a life worth living and all needs are already provided, any choice to work for money is a free one.

    • @automaton
      link
      Français
      21 year ago

      Who decides what constitutes surplus?