@[email protected] to linuxmemesEnglish • edit-21 year agojpeg-xl-meme.webpfeddit.deimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down128
arrow-up1471arrow-down1imagejpeg-xl-meme.webpfeddit.de@[email protected] to linuxmemesEnglish • edit-21 year agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoFek google and its avif. JPEG XL is much efficient
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoJPEG-XL is open and free aswell! I am talking about efficiency. It takes much less space for the same image with no quality loss
minus-square@ryannathanslink3•1 year agoI am not sure that claim is entirely correct, do you have testing to share against avif? I haven’t found anything to come out on top of avif, my whole library is avif now so I have done a lot of testing and encoding
Fek google and its avif. JPEG XL is much efficient
Avif is av1 based, open and free.
JPEG-XL is open and free aswell! I am talking about efficiency. It takes much less space for the same image with no quality loss
I am not sure that claim is entirely correct, do you have testing to share against avif? I haven’t found anything to come out on top of avif, my whole library is avif now so I have done a lot of testing and encoding