Edit - This is a post to the meta group of Blåhaj Lemmy. It is not intended for the entire lemmyverse. If you are not on Blåhaj Lemmy and plan on dropping in to offer your opinion on how we are doing things in a way you don’t agree with, your post will be removed.

==

A user on our instance reported a post on lemmynsfw as CSAM. Upon seeing the post, I looked at the community it was part of, and immediately purged all traces of that community from our instance.

I approached the admins of lemmynsfw and they assured me that the models with content in the community were all verified as being over 18. The fact that the community is explicitly focused on making the models appear as if they’re not 18 was fine with them. The fact that both myself and one a member of this instance assumed it was CSAM, was fine with them. I was in fact told that I was body shaming.

I’m sorry for the lack of warning, but a community skirting the line trying to look like CSAM isn’t a line I’m willing to walk. I have defederated lemmynsfw and won’t be reinstating it whilst that community is active.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    I guess Trans Littles can just go fuck off then? One of the biggest Trans comics artist is openly a little. Why are we in the business of regulating what consenting adults do?

    • ‘Leigh 🏳️‍⚧️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Don’t be disingenuous. Genuine consent practices also consider that not everyone else consents to witnessing their play, so they don’t do it where it’s not welcomed. And it’s not welcomed on Blahaj Zone, in this case. That’s all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        341 year ago

        Exscuse me but you’re the one being disengenious, a NSFW instance had what!? Porn!? Stop the fucking presses. Are we going to defederate from all porn instances or just the ones you find icky? Where can I post my objection to having to be subjected to porn at all?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Responses are pointless, I’m going to remake my account in another instance when I’m done with work. Enjoy insulting people and living your prudish dreams

      • Melmi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        I think it’s a little more complicated than that. If it were just a matter of not consenting to seeing their play, that community would be blocked. But instead, the entire instance has been defederated, so that’s not really a fair comparison.

          • Melmi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            151 year ago

            Leigh made an analogy to how in kink communities, it’s generally not cool to involve people in your kink who didn’t consent to it, and that defederating was basically just Blahaj Zone saying that they don’t consent to seeing any sort of ageplay-adjacent content.

            I’m saying that’s a bad analogy, because they could just ban the offending content if that was the only concern; instead they’ve banned the entire instance by association. I’m not saying it’s a bad call, just that it’s a step beyond “don’t involve me in your kink”, it’s now “I don’t want to see anyone who lives in the same house as you while you do your kink, even if it has nothing to do with your kink.”

            • KairuByte
              link
              English
              81 year ago

              It goes beyond even that, actually. This isn’t one individual making the decision for themselves, this is one individual making the decision for their entire household. “I don’t want anyone who lives in the same house as me to see anyone who lives in the same house as you, because you did your kink, even if it has nothing to do with your kink.”

              • Melmi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                At some point the metaphor starts falling apart a bit…

            • ‘Leigh 🏳️‍⚧️
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Is it actually possible to instance-level ban a community that’s hosted by another instance without defederating? I’m under the belief that it isn’t, but if I’m wrong on that, then I think I’d agree with you here.

    • AdaOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      No one is looking at a little and thinking that they’re physically 15.

        • AdaOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Young looking adults also aren’t the issue.

          The issue is a community that focuses heavily on models that are framed to look like they’re not adults.

          Not adults roleplaying. Not adults that incidentally happen to look younger than they are.

            • AdaOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -51 year ago

              Again, the issue is a community with models that are framed to look like they’re not adults.

              There is no scenario where something that can be mistaken for CSAM will have a space here.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                221 year ago

                And again, these are adults on an instance that was explicitly designated for NSFW works. Defederating was entirely within your right but these justifications seem really poorly thought out, and could have unintended consequences.

                Should we shun non consensual play? Should we defederate from anything that shows BDSM? Because I can’t see any reason why your justifications wouldn’t apply to them

                • AdaOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  91 year ago

                  Defederating was entirely within your right but these justifications seem really poorly thought out, and could have unintended consequences.

                  You disagreeing with the decision doesn’t make it poorly thought out.

                  Because I can’t see any reason why your justifications wouldn’t apply to them

                  There is no outcome here that leads to me saying “Ah, good point, this makes me ok with content that can be mistaken for CSAM”

                  Hypotheticals and what ifs do not change the fact that I encountered something that looked like CSAM, and when I looked at the community in question, I encountered more of it.

                  That’s a hard no.