• @ShakeThatYam
    link
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sorry I didn’t realize you weren’t OP. But, I’m not sure whyyou’re bringing up something irrelevant to the comment I was responding to. OP was talking about booby traps not meeting the “intent to kill” standard. I was providing a case where it met that standard.

    Talking about the law in Texas isn’t particularly beneficial anyway because there very likely isn’t a booby trap case from Texas, these cases aren’t particularly common (and based on my cursory research I haven’t been able to find one). The Illinois case would be of use in a Texas case because it would be persuasive authority for Texas to interpret the law the same way. The equivalent to the Illinois first degree murder statue in Texas appears to be capital murder and second degree murder. Both have the intent requirement (Texas actually doesn’t have something called first degree murder). So, if Texas follows Illinois’s interpretation then one would similarly face murder charges in Texas.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Isn’t this on federal property anyway as it’s in the waterway? This would be felony murder if we’re going down that route. Texas law would be moot.