Since countering Aldean’s claim the video only contains “real news footage,” Destinee Stark has received a wave of hateful messages from defenders of the song.

  • @SCB
    link
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean this song is dumb as fuck but the quote is misleading.

    That last line is the start of a second verses focusing on how you can’t take his granpappy’s gun - it’s not part of a continued threat from the first verse

    OP definitely knew this, because the punctuation doesn’t even line up as if it were the end of the verse. This is deliberately misleading, which is weird, because the song is obviously already ridden with shit lines.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 year ago

      The entire thing is a threat of violence, see all the un-bolded parts. Like literally what is different about a small town in this song which forces people to stop burning flags, except that they will violently prevent you from exercising your first amendment rights?

      Immediately mentioning a gun is specifying gun violence but threatening violence in reaction to free speech in general is illegal and an immoral call for vigilante justice.

    • czech
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Yes the implied violence and the introduction of grandpas gun are purely coincidental! How misleading of OP!

      • @SCB
        link
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is misleading. The second verse literally has its own implied threat.

        Got a gun that my granddad gave me

        They say one day they’re gonna round up

        Well, that shit might fly in the city, good luck

        This is just how songs, paragraphs, and language in general work.

        • czech
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Just because the second verse literally has its own implied threat does not mean the first verse is unrelated. In songs and paragraphs adjacent sentences are typically related- its how English works- but I can’t speak for all languages.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            151 year ago

            It’s not “unrelated”. It’s just not part of the same shitty statement. It’s part of a different shitty statement.

        • @Oderus
          link
          -11 year ago

          Working hard defending this guy aren’t you?

          • @SCB
            link
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No. I’m against people intentionally misleading others even when I agree with their general thrust.

            If people stopped buying in when they were being obviously mislead, we wouldn’t have had Trump

            This really shouldn’t be such a hard concept for you to grasp.

            • @Oderus
              link
              -11 year ago

              That’s a lot of words to say, ‘yeah, I am spending a lot of personal, unpaid time to defend someone I don’t know’.

              • @SCB
                link
                41 year ago

                Except I’m literally attacking both the song and the OP’s lying comment.

                Quit being stupid. It’s a bad look.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      91 year ago

      Except that’s not how songs are received. We don’t read them. We listen to them. And the two topic dog whistle is as old as Jim Crow.

      • @SCB
        link
        -101 year ago

        Imagine listening to music and not being able to tell where different verses are. Song must be confusing!

    • southsamurai
      link
      fedilink
      -71 year ago

      Exactly.

      Also, these motherfuckers can’t see the joke in my comment. People be trippin hard lol