• @fernfrost
    link
    English
    521 year ago

    And still underpaying the artists compared to Apple Music

      • Bernie Ecclestoned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        the company’s expenses for research and development, marketing, and administrative costs totaled a staggering €978 million

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            141 year ago

            It also says marketing, so who knows how much of that is actually for research and development.

            I imagine spotify could research how to make their data centers and delivery more efficient, music suggestion algorithms, or just in general how to best retain and aquire new customers.

    • @FantasticFox
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      It’s revenue share with the record labels. If those labels don’t pay the artists well that’s a different issue.

      • scytale
        link
        English
        161 year ago

        I release independently and I earned a whopping $43 for 50k+ streams (so far). Sure, 50k isn’t much compared to mainstream artists, but $43 isn’t much either.

        • @FantasticFox
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          It’s revenue share based on how many streams you get. Big record labels can probably negotiate a better share, but if you sign to one there’s no guarantee you will actually see that extra money.

          Record labels ripping off music artists was incredibly common in the time before streaming, so I imagine it still is today.

        • @Ryumast3r
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          That’s about what YouTube creators would get for the same amount of hits, which still doesn’t make it a lot but I think it’s an interesting comparison.