Ms Luke said the nightmare began after her information was compromised in the Medibank data breach.

She said this was the only breach of her information she was aware of.

Medibank released a statement to the ABC saying none of its customers’ passwords were compromised in the breach, and it was therefore in no way connected to what unfolded for Ms Luke.

Ms Luke said hackers took control of her PayPal account, in a credential stuffing attack that affected 35,000 PayPal customers in December.

Credential stuffing is where hackers access an account by using automation to try out username and password pairs sourced from data leaks on various websites.

Ms Luke said over the course of two days from December 6 to 8, her PayPal account was used to make hundreds of fraudulent transactions.

She was then served electronically with papers from the US District Court of Florida outlining Adidas’ case against her.

Similar charges against her were also filed by the National Basketball Association in the District Court of Illinois.

In both cases, Adidas and the NBA were given leave by the courts to run the cases ex parte — without a requirement for all parties in the case to be present.

In court documents seen by the ABC, default judgements were handed down by the US courts and damages were awarded against Ms Luke of $US200,000 ($293,000) in the NBA case and $US1million ($1.5 million) in the Adidas matter.

  • @KuroiKaze
    link
    741 year ago

    What in the holy fuck are these courts thinking

    • GataZapata
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      As a Australian woman, she did not present for Florida court. So the court defaulted judgment to the party that did

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Yeah, she didn’t present because she’s not an idiot. And these lawyers and judges just did what they do best and fondled corporate balls, probably didn’t even look at the evidence or make an effort to find the truth.

    • @xkforce
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only way I could see it making sense is if the courts thought that she lied. (they apparently held court without the defendant being present so presumably there was no defense)