FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore::Chair proposes 100Mbps national standard and an evaluation of broadband prices.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 year ago

    It’s 2023. Anything less than symmetrical gigabit is nonsense. We shouldn’t have to settle for overpriced crumbs from ISPs.

    • @imperator3733
      link
      English
      511 year ago

      Symmetrical gigabit is a bit much for a baseline. Should it be widely available for all, and for a good price? Absolutely. But plenty of people (probably a majority even) could be adequately served by something like 300 down/100 up as a baseline tier.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Let me go ahead and steal a quote from JFK:

        “We choose to [build nationwide symmetrical gigabit fiber] in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others, too.”

        • John “I hate my worthless nephew RFK Jr.”Fitzpatrick Kennedy
      • @vzq
        link
        English
        251 year ago

        It’s not about what people need. It’s about building infrastructure for new services and applications.

        Besides, digging a trench is digging a trench. Just put in the fiber. It’s 2023.

      • Neshura
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        imo the asymmetry only serves to upsell content creators to business plans. I do agree with you on the speeds though, gigabit is a bit overblown for average joe but it should be an option in most places for people that need it (Content Creators, WFH Visual Artists, Garage Startups)

      • @889296
        link
        English
        141 year ago

        Today, maybe. But what about in ten years’ time?

    • @regbin_
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      IMO the focus should be on lowering the prices. A lot of people in my country still rely on spotty mobile data as their primary internet. Imagine 100 mbps fiber for $10 a month, that would be awesome.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I don’t disagree, but I think even just setting it to 500M symmetrical would be a MASSIVE improvement and a more achievable goal. Few regions right now are equipped for fiber and even fewer homes.

      Most homes in the US have a coax connection, and with current tech coax connections can do a little over a gig bandwidth total (up+down). That said, we should be quickly ratcheting up to 500/500 while the fiber rollout hopefully accelerates.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        The depressing part is how much fiber is out there, but dark or locked in ridiculous agreements with private owners that will keep it from being the municipal service it deserves to be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The last house I owned had fiber in the front yard that the ISP refused to hook up. The entire neighborhood (300+ houses) had the same situation. Verizon laid the fiber, and Frontier refused to let anyone use it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Why does it matter if it’s 500/500 or 1000/1000? Once the fiber is there it makes no difference. In fact, 500Mbit symmetrical is probably more expensive to deploy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Once the fiber is there it makes no difference

          Because the fiber isn’t there. We could achieve 500/500 on current networks without running fiber to every single home. I’m just saying it’s a good interim goal as we work towards a full fiber rollout.

    • @MeanEYE
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Funny thing is, they are selling vapor. They are renting the usage of equipment, nothing more. There’s no finite amount of internet and you have to use it carefully. Sure there’s limits in that equipment, but essentially prices are all over-inflated. In my shitty little country I have 350/150 for around 15€, 300 channels TV included. For gigabit I’d pay a bit more, around 30€.