• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    You already said the youtube thing.

    Upvoting posts that are relevant or good quality and ignoring the rest does work though. There are several instances right now where it is working.

    It works perfectly fine as a content curation method. I have no way to prove this for this, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it works better.

    • DMmeYourNudes
      link
      -71 year ago

      You can’t ignore bad posts when they get inflated ranking because no one can downvote them off the front page lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        They never are on the front page. Idk why you don’t get this. If I sort by new I see them but only then. If I did see a post on the front page that I don’t like, obviously it is just a matter of taste. It doesn’t bother me that I can’t downvote it.

        • DMmeYourNudes
          link
          -11 year ago

          You really don’t understand how removing the recourse from users to downvote bad content is a negative to any link agregator? Do you just never go to small subs and see less than 5 posts from the last week and not understand that someone could just flood those communities with poor content and the only recourse is for mods to ban that user who could have not even violated their rules? This is to say nothing of how bad nitch communities are already on Lemmy, if we remove the users ability to group moderate it would be even worse.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            If I was moderating a small community and someone flooded it with unwanted content, I would consider that spam, which I would have against the rules.

            So it would be a perfectly reasonable ban for an explicit rules violation.

            • DMmeYourNudes
              link
              -11 year ago

              It’s not spam, it’s content within the rules, it just bad. That’s the situation we’re trying to avoid so that bad content is seen by the least amount. Of users. When you can’t downvote bad content, the moderators have to remove the content so we have just pushed more work onto moderators. Congratulations.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Lots of bad content posted excessively is spam. I refuse to let you handwave that, that is what spam is. But I’d like to be done here, I’m not enjoying this back and forth. You keep whatever opinion you want.

                • DMmeYourNudes
                  link
                  -21 year ago

                  So how do you know it’s bad content if no one downvoted it? A lack of upvotes does not mean it’s bad, it could easily mean no one saw it and they simply fall of their first page too quickly to ever see it, a common issue on Lemmy. You’re just making a judgement on what is or isn’t good content, meaning the quality is no measured by the mods, not the users.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    Simple. If the post is old and has no upvotes, I assume everyone else thought it was bad.

                    But really, on a post by post basis, I make up my own mind? Do you not? Like, do you decide whether or not you like a post based on the votes it has? Because I just, like it or dont like it.