• @gosling
    link
    English
    951 year ago

    I don’t get how people expect services to stay free while also being against any kind of subscription or ads and barely donate to support these projects.

    This isn’t an essential feature they’re paywalling. I don’t even remember the last time I sent a voice note, let alone get one from a stranger. Feels more like a thank you from the devs for supporting them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      I’d understand paying for an active feature, like to SEND voice messages, but not having to pay to restrict spam sent my way.

      • @gosling
        link
        English
        60
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is VOICE MESSAGE we’re talking about, not calls nor chats. You can already block calls from non contacts and create a folder to only show chats from your contact.

        How many voice message spams have you received that you feel like this is a deal breaker and how is Signal an appropriate alternative in this regard, when it doesn’t even have as many privacy options including this one?

        • deweydecibel
          link
          English
          -121 year ago

          If it wasn’t useful it wouldn’t be paywalled.

    • Ser Salty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Also it’s not like voice messages auto play, so this really isn’t a necessary feature