• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think you can say is a pyramid scheme in the way you can’t really make money if you aren’t making money for someone upper on the ladder, even if are an independent business owner, you still have loans to pay or equipment that is sold by a corporation.

    • @EhList
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Everywhere around you, you can see work that need to be done, from streets that need to be fixed or land that could be cultivated, and all those work keep undone, because nobody up the ladder would get money from it.

        • @EhList
          link
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • migo
        link
        81 year ago

        When you have to eat and the means to feed ourselves is held by few, no transaction is voluntary.

        • @hemko
          link
          -21 year ago

          Of course it’s voluntary. You choose what you buy, when you do it, how much and from whom.

          If someone held you on gunpoint and told you to buy their product, that would be involuntary.

          • @Ranolden
            link
            31 year ago

            You can choose what, when, how much, and from whom, but you are still are still forced to do so. Choosing which person puts me at gunpoint doesn’t make it voluntary

            • @hemko
              link
              -11 year ago

              You can also feed yourself by growing food or hunting. Neither of those are banned, just more inconvenient and you probably have some other skills to sell and buy food instead

              • @Ranolden
                link
                21 year ago

                I can only do so on land that I purchased. Or on someone else’s land I purchased the right to do so on

                • @hemko
                  link
                  01 year ago

                  Then do that, or choose not to.

                  • @Ranolden
                    link
                    31 year ago

                    If I choose not to I die. I can buy the food from someone who already has it, I can buy the right to make my own food, or I can choose to starve to death

                • @Godric
                  link
                  -11 year ago

                  Or hunt on public land.

                  • @Ranolden
                    link
                    3
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    That costs money. I have to buy the right to hunt on public land or I go to prison for poaching

          • the post of tom joad
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You are forced to buy food, shelter, healthcare, a vehicle (US). You are forced therefore to have a job to pay for these things. Employers know this, and suppress wages with those together, the proverbial gun.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Generally speaking, slavery is also benefitial to both parties, you’re either a slave out you get killed. While technically voluntary (because a slave can still choose stand up to the oppressor, even if it’s guaranteed to fail) we don’t consider slavery voluntary. We can say that in this day and age our work is voluntary, but it’s debatable.

        You can look to this year how “voluntary” it is when the Hollywood execs literally said they will wait for the protesters to starve so they’d get back to work. When there’s such a severe power dynamic it becomes almost no different to slavery, because you, individually, can be effectively forced back to work. The only reason Hollywood protests have any chance to have impact is because they collectively oppose the oppression. The power dynamic is being balanced (or dipped in the favor of labor) by sheer number of protestors / workers.