Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment

andymasley.substack.com

cross-posted to:
technology
[email protected]

-145

Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment

andymasley.substack.com

AnonomousWolf to

TechnologyEnglish · 2 months ago

cross-posted to:
technology
[email protected]

Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet

andymasley.substack.com

The numbers clearly show this is a pointless distraction for the climate movement

Please actually read the article before downvoting me into oblivion, or debunk it before just shouting AI = BAD I’m also against AI for privacy reasons, but can we please stop pretending that it’s destroying the environment.

Chat

AnonomousWolfOP
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
4
arrow-down
2·
2 months ago
It’s already included in the 3Wh calculation

Technology

technology

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

4.26K users / day
8.4K users / week
14.8K users / month
33.7K users / 6 months
37.8K local subscribers
76.2K subscribers
16.3K Posts
712K Comments
Modlog