pocker_machine to Showerthoughts · 6 months agoWhen robots create robots, we would call them as 'robots' too. By the same logic if God created us, robots are humans according to God.message-squaremessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down128
arrow-up1-15arrow-down1message-squareWhen robots create robots, we would call them as 'robots' too. By the same logic if God created us, robots are humans according to God.pocker_machine to Showerthoughts · 6 months agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squarepocker_machineOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·6 months agoI understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂
minus-squaresquaresingerlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoThat point quickly devolves into “What would a hypothetical being that’s completely different from us and not knowable do?” Or to put it differently: “What would something we can’t understand be like?” It’s kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.
minus-squarepocker_machineOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoInteresting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.
minus-squareDUMBASS@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 months agoSall good, I was just stoned replying.
I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂
That point quickly devolves into “What would a hypothetical being that’s completely different from us and not knowable do?”
Or to put it differently: “What would something we can’t understand be like?”
It’s kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.
Interesting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.
Sall good, I was just stoned replying.