• 520
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Oculus (so Facebook) Quest works pretty well.

      The Quest works because it is a standalone device. You don’t have to plug anything into the unit, you don’t have to have wires everywhere, and you don’t have a significant risk smashing the unit to the floor because you literally can’t see where the cables are, what they’re snagging on, etc.

      Meanwhile, conventional VR setups get around this by the PC being heavier than a handheld, as well as possibly by being situated under the desks. Laptops are less risk still than a SD, because the former is still heavier than a Nintendo Switch and is made to be used on a desk, with rubber feet for grip, something the SD form factor doesn’t have

      That and the conventional use case for the SD is fundamentally incompatible from a user experience perspective. It’s a mess of cables, and most VR software requires more physics space to operate than you would realistically have in a non-home environment.

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Its almost like you actively ignored where I pointed out Deckard which is strongly beleived to be a “fanny pack” VR.

          I did. Partially because it is a rumour and not an actual product yet but also because, quite crucially to the point, it won’t be a Steam Deck form factor PC. Because my entire point hinges around:

          Steam Deck form factor + conventional VR setup with all the typical wires and stuff = considerable liability and just not fun.

          My argument is not about the Linux OS but the form factor of the Steam Deck. A problem that wouldn’t be solved by slapping Windows on it.