minus-square@JackLSaucelink2•1 year agoI could see this being perceived very differently based on the monitor on which it’s displayed
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIt was presumably designed for old CRT monitors with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Either way, it’s not 2005 any more.
minus-squareGhoelianlinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-21 year agoIt’s 16:10 (1920x1200), pretty sure it’s the second most used aspect ratio, after 16:9.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI meant originally. The version above was taken from an unofficial source.
I could see this being perceived very differently based on the monitor on which it’s displayed
It was presumably designed for old CRT monitors with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Either way, it’s not 2005 any more.
It’s 16:10 (1920x1200), pretty sure it’s the second most used aspect ratio, after 16:9.
I meant originally. The version above was taken from an unofficial source.