• AA5B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sure but I’d argue an example of wasted research is someone investigating the harm of mercury caused by vaccinations. Again. After it’s long been settled. Overwhelmingly

    So part of the problem is it’s easy to believe some research is ridiculous, especially if you don’t understand it or don’t have context. And especially when there are politicians or lobbyists who find it profitable to mischaracterize or cast doubt. I really think the only answer is to restore respect for science, trust in whatever committee vets the research proposals. While that can be the road to wasted research, it’s much better than the current method of manipulated public opinion

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      “replication crisis”

      I agree that the utility of revisiting an already well-researched question is low, but I don’t think it’s entirely wasted. Replication and in particular failure to replicate existing results is when a team can learn good things, rarely a breakthrough, often just that their procedures need refinement.

      Absolutely there are much higher priority work to which public funds should go.