The fact that this has been replicated is amazing!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Stupid question probably - is computing power what is holding back general AI? I’ve not heard that.

    • Dr. Dabbles
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      What’s holding back AGI is a complete lack of progress toward anything like intelligence. What we have now isn’t intelligent, it’s multi-variable probability.

      • @JGrffn
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        It’s not that it’s not intelligent, it’s that predictive language models are obviously just one piece of the puzzle, and we’re going to need all the pieces to get to AGI. It’s looking incredibly doable if we figured out how to make something that’s dumb but sounds smarter than most of us already. We just need to connect it to other models that handle other things better.

        • Dr. Dabbles
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          You don’t speak predictively. It’s not one of the pieces, it’s a parlor trick.

        • @Ogmios
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

    • @knotthatone
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Simply throwing computing power at the existing models won’t get us general AI. It will let us develop bigger and more complex models, but there’s no guarantee that’ll get us closer to the real thing.

      • @MuThyme
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

          • @MuThyme
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

              • @MuThyme
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Really appreciate the write up! I didn’t know the computing power required!

        Another stupid question (if you don’t mind) - adding superconductors to GPUs doesn’t really se like it would make a huge difference on the heat generation. Sure, some of the heat generated is through trace resistance, but the overwhelming majority is the switching losses of the transistors which will not be effected by superconductor technology. Are we assuming these superconductors will be able to replace semiconductors too? Where are these CPU/GPU efficiencies coming from?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Semiconductors are used for transistors because they give us the ability to electrically control whether they conduct or resist electrical current. I don’t know what mechanism you’d use to do that with superconductors. I agree you don’t ‘have’ to have resistance in order to achieve this functionality, but at this time semiconductors or mechanical relays are the only ways we have to do that. My focus is not in semiconductor / IC design either so I may by way off base, but I don’t know of a mechanism that would allow superconductors to function as transistors (or “electrically controlled electrical connections”), but I really hope I’m wrong!