@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoWho's hungry?files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1295arrow-down153
arrow-up1242arrow-down1imageWho's hungry?files.catbox.moe@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-square@Sterile_TechniquelinkEnglish19•1 year agoThe most unbelievable part of this image is that they’re only 120 calories. …wonder what the caffeine content is.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoWhat kind of sugars are so low in calories that you can add 20g of them but end up with just 120 (kilo)calories?
minus-square@Sterile_TechniquelinkEnglish1•1 year agoSucralose. If you added however many grams of regular sucrose adds up to 120 calories, then the rest of the 20 grams as sucralose, technically you could make it work.
minus-square@Sterile_TechniquelinkEnglish1•1 year agoLegally / nutrition labelly, no. But it is a sugar, just not one we can digest.
The most unbelievable part of this image is that they’re only 120 calories.
…wonder what the caffeine content is.
What kind of sugars are so low in calories that you can add 20g of them but end up with just 120 (kilo)calories?
Sucralose.
If you added however many grams of regular sucrose adds up to 120 calories, then the rest of the 20 grams as sucralose, technically you could make it work.
Does sucralose count towards “sugars”?
Legally / nutrition labelly, no. But it is a sugar, just not one we can digest.