The judge in former U.S. President Donald Trump’s upcoming trial over his handling of classified documents made two key errors in a June trial, one of which violated a fundamental constitutional right of the defendant and could have invalidated the proceedings, according to legal experts and a court transcript.
Sorry. Didn’t mean to assume. I “ask questions” to challenge the way people think. It’s not always concern trolling. I’m not open-minded though. I detest echo chambers.
I always take the time to listen to people, you should try it someday!
Listen to echo chambers?
Listen to people, like I said.
If you assume everything that’s being said outside of your predefined worldviews are an echo chamber, aren’t you guilty of the exact same thing?
As if I didn’t already listen to people. And no, I strive to not have an echo chamber. Is that an echo chamber unto itself? Is life a simulation?
Why do you keep linking things without context or a summary of what you’re linking?
If you call everything you disagree with an echo chamber and you admit you’re closed minded then yes, you strive to be in an echo chamber.
Baudrillard is a philosopher that wrote about hyper reality and simulation. I was being hyperbolic about being closed minded. Look at my history before assuming anything else about me. I’ve looked at yours. Are you North Korean?
So I shouldn’t listen to what you are saying but look into your comment history to see what you really mean?
That’s not a great style of communication.
Yes. It gives context to my intent. Seriously, how is North Korea? I’m genuinely curious.