Pornhub goes dark in Arkansas after age verification law kicks in::Pornhub operator MindGeek has blocked all users in Arkansas from the site after the state’s new age verification law went into effect.

  • @Scrongle
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not sure what the spirit is behind this comment, but for all the cases that could be made in advocacy for porn, I don’t think this should be one. If porn is the only thing keeping rape cases from drastically increasing, there is something much more broken in our society, and access to porn won’t fix that.

    Edit: Holy shit, guys. I thought poor reading comprehension and inflammatory dog-piling was something that wouldn’t be so commonplace, after moving here from Reddit. Where did I say I support anything about what these pieces of legislation are enforcing? Every single response I’ve gotten so far has been arguing different points of discussion, of which my comment has nothing to do with. All I said was “GIVE THE RAPISTS THEIR PORN SO WE CAN BE SAFE!!!” isn’t exactly a strong angle to approach the issue from. One user is even sharing a study that includes data showing that giving pedophiles access to child pornography reduces rates of sexual assault with children. Like, no shit, but is the lack of child pornography really the core issue at that point? Don’t bother replying to me if you just want to put words in my mouth, and assume my stances on topics which I so far haven’t shared.

    • @CapraObscura
      link
      English
      241 year ago

      The spirit is quite clearly that rape and abuse numbers will likely go up slightly anywhere porn is banned.

      Nobody said “drastically.”

      • @Resistentialism
        link
        English
        151 year ago

        Holy shit I never thought I’d get to use line before.

        “Anyway, walk to your cars in pairs tonight. Rape’s up 8 percent”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Do you lock your door at night or when you leave? You shouldn’t have to, but you currently need to. So it would be stupid not to.

    • @willis936
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’d rather rape rates be higher because the knob we know we can turn is slightly distasteful?

      Edit: GP is a coward and edited their comment rather than try to defend their pro-rape stance.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        “human nature” is such a loaded phrase that generally is only used justify bullshit. and linking some article from some site that reports on some study somewhere isn’t going to change that

      • @Scrongle
        link
        English
        -101 year ago

        I am utterly unsurprised that there is evidence of a correlation between access to pornography and rates of sex-related crimes. However, I stand by what I said.

        • @CapraObscura
          link
          English
          141 year ago

          “We shouldn’t use evidence that banning porn has a potentially deleterious effect to make a decision on banning porn. We should use The Jesus!”

          It’s not OUR society that you’re responding to. It’s NUMEROUS societies.

          The rest of the world does exist, ya know.

          • @Scrongle
            link
            English
            -101 year ago

            You are just shoveling words into my mouth, but go off dude. Hope you feel better.

    • @SloppyPuppy
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      No spirit at all. Genuinely want to see if / how these change.

      I have a feeling they wont.